Menu

Brazil Uses Panama Friendly to Test New IFAB Rules Before World Cup

Brazil and Panama agreed to allow up to 11 substitutions in a Maracanã friendly, giving Carlo Ancelotti a chance to rotate his squad. The match also served as an early test for rule changes aimed at reducing time-wasting.

Brazil Uses Panama Friendly to Test New IFAB Rules Before World Cup

Source: oglobo.globo.com

Brazil’s final home friendly before the 2026 World Cup became more than a send-off match. The 2-0 win over Panama at Rio de Janeiro’s Maracanã stadium also gave Brazil a live test of new football rules and an unusually broad substitution agreement.

Brazil and Panama were allowed to make up to 11 substitutions each, according to Brazilian outlets. That gave Carlo Ancelotti, Brazil’s Italian head coach, room to use almost his entire available squad before the team’s departure for the tournament.

The match also previewed changes approved by the International Football Association Board (IFAB), the body that writes football’s laws. Several of the measures are designed to keep the ball in play longer and reduce deliberate delays.

Why 11 Changes Were Allowed

The substitution limit was not a World Cup rule. Terra reported that the expanded number applied because the match was a friendly and both federations had agreed to it in advance.

ESPN Brasil reported before the game that the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) and Panama’s federation had been negotiating the arrangement for days. The goal was to let both Ancelotti and Panama coach Thomas Christiansen assess more players than the usual five-substitution framework would allow.

Ancelotti had signaled the approach before the match. ESPN quoted him as saying: “Tomorrow everyone will play. It is preparation [for the World Cup], important for us to say goodbye to our fans, to our stadium.”

O Globo and Folha de Pernambuco linked the arrangement to one of international football’s best-known substitution controversies: England’s 2003 friendly against Australia at Upton Park in London. Sven-Göran Eriksson replaced almost an entire team at halftime, and England lost 3-1. The mass changes drew criticism from officials, former players and fans who argued that too many substitutions weakened the competitive value of friendlies.

The Rule Changes

Beyond the substitutions, the Brazil-Panama match was used as a practical test for rule changes tied to VAR, restarts, substitutions and medical treatment.

Lance reported that Brazil’s squad and coaching staff were briefed on the changes at Granja Comary, the CBF’s training center in Teresópolis, by Rodrigo Cintra, president of the CBF refereeing commission. Cintra said the aim was to make the game fairer and increase effective playing time.

Under the new guidelines described by Lance and Terra, VAR can intervene in more situations. These include red cards that result from an incorrect second yellow card, cases in which the wrong player is booked or sent off, and incorrect corner-kick or goal-kick decisions before play restarts.

The anti-time-wasting measures introduce visible five-second countdowns for throw-ins and goal kicks after the referee begins the count. If a throw-in is not taken in time, possession is reversed. If a goal kick is delayed beyond the limit, the opponent receives a corner.

Less Room for Delay

Substitutions also face tighter control. Once the fourth official displays the change, the player leaving the pitch has 10 seconds to exit by the nearest point. If he exceeds that limit, the substitute must wait until one minute after the next stoppage before entering.

Medical treatment is another target. Outfield players treated on the pitch must stay off the field for at least one minute after play resumes. Lance said the rule includes exceptions for goalkeepers, concussions, cardiac issues, serious head injuries, heavy collisions between teammates and cases in which the opponent receives a yellow or red card for the foul.

For Brazil, the friendly gave Ancelotti a rare chance to combine a tactical rehearsal, squad rotation and rule adaptation in one match. For supporters, it offered an early look at how the World Cup may be refereed: faster restarts, more VAR correction, and less tolerance for delaying tactics.

Accessed on: 1 June 2026

More in Sports
See all Sports stories